I / The rules of the method Here are seven simple points that should be made at the outset in order to avoid any misunderstanding. If you follow them scrupulously, -write my essay there is no reason to miss your duty. It is therefore required:

1. That the candidate saw that the subject raised a problem, that he formulated it and tried to solve it.
2. That the proposed solution rests on an argument which justifies it and not on simple affirmations.
3. That the argument be constructed and not be reduced to a simple juxtaposition of examples or remarks. [there is no standard plan: the absence of a plan alone can be penalized]

4. That the candidate shows a minimum of knowledge on the problem he has chosen to deal with - whether this comes from the teacher's course or from personal experiences and readings.

5. That this knowledge be well assimilated, that it be the occasion of a personal reflection and not of the recitation of a course.

6. That the candidate is able to analyze the concepts correctly and that he has a sufficient mastery of the vocabulary he uses.

7. Finally, that the expression - intended to convince - be simple, clear and distinct.

II / How to start your dissertation? The preparatory part is essential, because it is on it that the success or failure of the assignment largely depends. The meaning of the words in the subject statement should grab your attention. What does such a concept mean in a very precise way on the literary, philosophical, pdo my essay possibly scientific level? Once the basic terms have been clarified (with the help of Robert or a philosophical vocabulary such as the A to Z philosophy of Hatier editions, if you are at home), elucidate the meaning of the subject posed, by identifying the possible paradoxes, which are very frequent in the statements offered in the baccalaureate (example: Can we obey without ceasing to be free?). In short, be amazed in front of a subject, do not reduce it to something already known, try to use all the possible senses. A) Introduction The introduction of the essay has only one absolutely essential role: to carry out the analysis of the subject and to pose a problem. The latter never appears in full in the statement of the subject but, nevertheless, it is implicitly contained in him. If the subject is asked in the form of a question, the problem does not merge with the question. We cannot therefore take up the question again as a problem. So, does the subject think, is that saying no? , leads after analysis to the following problem: Is the power of negation an obstacle or a condition for genuinely free thought? Note that you should only ask one problem, even if, as is often the case, several problems are possible. Finally, because of the previous requirement, we must banish any generality or evidence of the type: "at all times, man etc." As well as any anecdotal consideration. We should only deal with the subject without giving in to the temptation to quote already in the introduction even if the philosophical and general culture reinforces the efficiency of the analysis. B) Development The body of the philosophical essay must take the form of a well-argued and progressive discussion in which each step is justified. Thought must be active and dynamic, not passive and routine. This philosophical discussion is above all conceptual: it designates an analysis of concepts and notions, which must be clarified and elucidated, in particular by resorting to well-chosen examples. If conceptual distinctions should take precedence and play the leading role, example, nevertheless, provides a vivid illustration to a reasoning. Although it cannot be used as a starting point, it gives more intensity to this reasoning. Note that if the example illustrates a concept, it does not demonstrate anything in itself. There remains the problem of philosophical references and their use in the discussion. They should never run empty: do not recite doctrines and theses. The golden rule of any discussion is this: deal with the subject, just the subject and only the subject! Do not recite your course, but adapt it to the topic; do not summarize the doctrines flatly but use them intelligently with regard to the subject. Do not reduce a specific question to school clichés ... The argued discussion, based on the analysis of concepts and philosophical references, illustrated by examples, must take place according to a precise articulation supporting a logical demonstration: a plan . But contrary to what many textbooks claim there is no blueprint. The only requirement is the internal consistency of the approach which is based on a precise analysis of the subject and sometimes a plan in only two parts is better than a classic plan in three parts of which the third is artificially conducted and often only rehashes a point previously mentioned. Even the famous dialectical plan of the thesis - antithesis - synthesis type, used by some as a magic formula, buy essay onlinecauses more blockages than it resolves difficulties. If you make the effort to justify your analyzes every time and take care of your logical transitions from one part to the other, everything will be fine. Have confidence in yourself and don't try to imitate the teacher or anyone; in short, be yourself. C) CONCLUSION Finally, in the conclusion, give a clear and precise answer to the problem posed in the introduction. If some textbooks advise opening a new perspective, we advise you, for our part, to remain modestly to the final point and to close the debate opened by the question and the problem